网站地图 - XML地图 - 设为首页 - 加入收藏
您的当前位置:主页 > 国内 > 正文

武林外传

Australia's defense‑funded report hypes risks to subsea cables to 'serve military goals'_我的网站

佩小姐的奇幻城堡

A |       讯 据公安部网安局消息,公安机关持续推进“净网—2026”专项行动,聚焦涉企领域网络谣言乱象,依法打击编造虚假信息恶意诋毁企业相关违法犯罪,维护企业合法权益。

B |     

Illustration: Liu Rui/GT
    Illustration: Liu Rui/GTA new report funded by Australia's Department of Defense played up security risks to submarine cables in the Indo-Pacific waters and pointed finger at China and some other countries over alleged undersea‑cable attacks in recent years, while claiming threats against subsea cables are growing. A Chinese expert said that accusing China without conclusive evidence constitutes "over‑securitization" made by Australian side, as well as a calculated pretext for its own military expansion.
Published by the National Security College at the Australian National University (ANU), the paper claimed recent damage to cables in the Baltic Sea and around China's Taiwan region suggests "state actors are now actively probing and testing cable infrastructure in peacetime as part of broader hybrid warfare strategies" to rapidly degrade connectivity at the outset of a conflict, The Australian reported.
The paper claimed 16 privately owned subsea cables that carry 99 percent of Australia's internet traffic are a "high priority target" for Australia's adversaries that could be severed in a conflict, threatening the nation's economy and social fabric, according to The Australian.
The report singled out China and Russia for blame, saying that there have been multiple apparent attacks on submarine cables in recent years in European waters as well as near China's Taiwan region, suspected to be linked to Russia and China, the Straits Times reported.
However, the report cites a 2025 voyage by Chinese research vessel Tan Suo Yi Hao along Australia's western and southern coastlines as evidence to back its claim that "potential adversaries are actively gathering information about Australia's cable infrastructure."
This report, relying on the routine scientific operations of a Chinese research vessel in 2025 to level allegations of offensive actions against China, and employing ambiguous terminology such as "suspected" and "potential," demonstrates Australia's evidentiary leap, Chen Hong, director of the Australian Studies Center of East China Normal University, told the Global Times on Monday.
This erroneous claim was refuted by the Chinese Foreign Ministry at the time. Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun said on March 31, 2025 that China carries out normal activities at sea in accordance with international law, including UNCLOS. 
"We hope Australia will have a right understanding of this and stop the groundless suspicion and speculations," Guo added.
This is not the first time certain Australian politicians has leveled baseless accusations of China intending to sabotage its undersea cables. Back in May, Defense Minister Richard Marles claimed during the Shangri-La Dialogue that China ought to boost transparency around its maritime operations. He also asserted that a surge in damage to subsea cables had transformed the seabed into a "battlefield," per The Australian.
Chen said Australian side's scaremongering is tied to its predictive threat‑perception framework forged in recent years. This framework designates China and other countries as strategic competitors in advance, subsequently forces routine scientific activities into a confrontational framework, Chen said.
Apart from unfounded allegations against China, the paper claims Australia's defense military "must incorporate the defense of submarine cable infrastructure into its operational planning," according to The Australian.
It added the government should also consider up¬grading an auxiliary ship operated by the navy, ADV Guidance, to enable it to repair damaged cables.
The vast majority of submarine cable damages are caused by accidental factors such as fishing operations and vessel anchoring, rather than deliberate sabotage. For suspected cases of intentional damage, independent technical investigation bodies should be established, and the principle of "investigate first, characterize later" should be strictly applied, so as to prevent ordinary maritime accidents from escalating into diplomatic conflicts, Chen said.
The core problem of Australian side's submarine cable security lies entirely with itself. Instead of addressing its own infrastructure shortcomings and improving its domestic protection and maintenance systems, the Australian side has chosen to continually exaggerate external threats and stoke bloc confrontation, the expert added.
Chen said that by fabricating alleged Chinese threats, Australian side seeks to "rationalize" its military spending increases and underwater force expansion. The submarine digital infrastructure originally meant to serve global development has been labeled along us versus them lines, and this constitutes the biggest hidden danger, he added.

C | 8月18日,公安部网安局公布14起涉企网络谣言典型案例。  案例一、内蒙古呼和浩特公安网安部门查明,网民樊某栋(男,34岁)为博取关注、吸粉引流,在抖音平台直播时编造“**品牌汽车撞死桥上维修工后冲下游轮,烧死外国人”“哈尔滨**品牌汽车冲入大楼爆炸起火,烧死3名环卫工”“云南昆明**品牌汽车后胎爆炸撞死少数民族人员”“武汉**品牌汽车冲入长江”等多条谣言信息,恶意诋毁相关企业及产品,引发该品牌用户恐慌,扰乱网络空间秩序,产生不良影响。目前,属地公安机关已依法对该樊处以行政处罚。  案例二、黑龙江鸡西公安网安部门查明,网民严某民(男,32岁)为博取关注、吸粉引流,编造“**智驾追尾致3死”等谣言信息,在微博平台发布,恶意诋毁相关企业及产品,引发该品牌用户恐慌,扰乱网络空间秩序,产生不良影响。目前,属地公安机关已依法对该严处以行政处罚。

D |   案例三、上海公安网安部门查明,网民池某磊(男,44岁)为发泄个人情绪,编造“**公司组织黑公关攻击友商”“**官方发布的漂移视频系使用AI生成”等多条谣言信息,在抖音、微信视频号平台发布,恶意诋毁相关企业及产品,并对其他网民进行恶意“攻击”,扰乱网络空间秩序,产生不良影响。目前,属地公安机关已依法对该池采取刑事强制措施。  案例四、上海公安网安部门查明,网民夏某秋(男,35岁)为发泄个人情绪,编造“十个事故九个是**公司产品”“十辆某公司产品九辆自燃”等多条谣言信息,在今日头条平台发布,并对其他网民进行恶意“攻击”,恶意诋毁相关企业及产品,引发该品牌用户恐慌,扰乱网络空间秩序,产生不良影响。目前,属地公安机关已依法对该夏处以行政处罚。  案例五、江苏无锡公安网安部门查明,网民王某华(男,34岁)为博取关注、吸粉引流,编造“**汽车在‘麋鹿测试’中断轴”等相关谣言信息,在抖音平台发布,恶意诋毁相关企业及产品,引发该品牌用户恐慌,扰乱网络空间秩序,产生不良影响。

E | 目前,属地公安机关已依法对该王处以行政处罚。  案例六、江苏扬州公安网安部门查明,网民王某秋(男,28岁)为博取关注、吸粉引流,编造“**智驾撞到环卫工”“**官方发布的漂移视频系使用AI生成”等多条谣言信息,在微信视频号、抖音平台发布,恶意诋毁相关企业及产品,引发该品牌用户恐慌,扰乱网络空间秩序,产生不良影响。目前,属地公安机关已依法对该王处以行政处罚。  案例七、浙江绍兴公安网安部门查明,网民郑某耀(男,26岁)为博取关注、吸粉引流,编造“**智驾撞死小孩子”等多条谣言信息,在抖音平台发布,恶意诋毁相关企业及产品,引发该品牌用户恐慌,扰乱网络空间秩序,产生不良影响。目前,属地公安机关已依法对该郑处以行政处罚。  案例八、福建漳州公安网安部门查明,网民陈某伟(男,33岁)为博取关注、吸粉引流,编造“**公司使用AI生成视频将旗下品牌汽车的交通事故嫁祸给其他公司”“**公司雇佣水军,**品牌将遭到打击”等多条谣言信息,在微信视频号、抖音平台发布,恶意诋毁相关企业及产品,扰乱网络空间秩序,产生不良影响。目前,属地公安机关已依法对该陈处以行政处罚。  案例九、河南商丘公安网安部门查明,网民薛某华(男,41岁)为博取关注、吸粉引流,使用AI工具生成“**品牌汽车车祸现场”虚假视频,在抖音平台发布,恶意诋毁相关企业及产品,引发该品牌用户恐慌,扰乱网络空间秩序,产生不良影响。目前,属地公安机关已依法对该薛处以行政处罚。  案例十、广西南宁公安网安部门查明,网民苏某安(男,42岁)为发泄个人情绪,编造“**品牌经销商跳楼”等多条谣言信息,在今日头条平台发布,并对其他网民进行恶意“攻击”,恶意诋毁相关企业及产品,引发该品牌用户恐慌,扰乱网络空间秩序,产生不良影响。目前,属地公安机关已依法对该苏处以行政处罚。  案例十一、广西河池公安网安部门查明,网民余某(男,39岁)为博取关注、吸粉引流,使用AI工具生成“**品牌汽车车祸现场”和涉及**公司负责人的虚假视频,在抖音平台发布,恶意诋毁相关企业及产品,扰乱网络空间秩序,产生不良影响。目前,属地公安机关已依法对该余处以行政处罚。  案例十二、广西北海公安网安部门查明,网民傅某龙(男,31岁)为发泄个人情绪,编造“**公司投入千亿对其他企业进行抹黑”“**公司组织数万博主怒骂其他企业”“**公司一条黑稿视频几百”等多条谣言信息,在哔哩哔哩平台发布,恶意诋毁相关企业,扰乱网络空间秩序,产生不良影响。

F | 目前,属地公安机关已依法对该傅处以行政处罚。  案例十三、陕西咸阳公安网安部门查明,网民蒙某远(男,37岁)为博取关注、吸粉引流,编造“**汽车轮胎不转轮毂转”等多条谣言信息,在微信视频号、抖音平台发布,恶意诋毁相关企业及产品,引发该品牌用户恐慌,扰乱网络空间秩序,产生不良影响。目前,属地公安机关已依法对该蒙处以行政处罚。  案例十四、甘肃陇南公安网安部门查明,网民张某龙(男,31岁)为博取关注、吸粉引流,编造“**公司经费不足连黑稿子都不审核了”“**公司每年千亿网络公关投入”等多条谣言信息,还恶意篡改**汽车宣传海报,在抖音平台发布,恶意诋毁相关企业及产品,扰乱网络空间秩序,产生不良影响。目前,属地公安机关已依法对该张处以行政处罚。

G | 版权申明:凡注有“”或电头为“”的稿件,均为独家版权所有,未经许可不得转载或镜像;授权转载必须注明来源为“”,并保留“”的电头。    。

H |

Current article:http://vhxz51.recuigoutoubaozukai.pics/s3ysm/20260826/591581.html

Published on:05:42:08


注:凡本网注明来源非本站的作品,均转载自其它媒体,并不代表本网赞同其观点和对其真实性负责。
本站致力于帮助文章传播,希望能够建立合作关系。
若有任何不适的联系以下方式我们将会在24小时内删除。联系方式:
Copyright © 2018 我的网站 版权所有